Computex 2025: Gaming Monitors Now Too Fast

Three new gaming monitors showcased at Computex are pushing the boundaries of refresh rates, with the fastest being the Asus ROG Strix Ace XG248QSG. This 1080p display boasts an impressive 610Hz refresh rate. Meanwhile, both MSI and Acer have introduced 1440p monitors with 500Hz refresh rates, which are challenging to drive even with an RTX 5090 and multi-frame generation technology.

Acer's model, the Predator X27U F5, features a QD-OLED display, ensuring exceptional color accuracy. It's initially launching in Europe and China with a starting price of €899. Acer has confirmed that the monitor will eventually be available in the US, though pricing details are pending due to ongoing negotiations related to tariffs. Given the rising cost of tech products in the US, affordability might be a concern.

MSI's offering, the 27-inch MPG 271QR X50, also includes a QD-OLED panel. A unique feature of this monitor is its AI-driven burn-in protection. A small sensor at the bottom of the display detects when you move away, triggering the monitor to turn off and refresh the pixels, thus preventing burn-in. This AI-based approach to burn-in protection is innovative, though it might feel a bit intrusive to some users.

Do Gaming Monitors Need to Be This Fast?

It's astonishing to see monitors with such high refresh rates, and the Asus ROG Strix Ace XG248QSG stands out with its 610Hz at 1080p. Even with Nvidia's multi-frame generation technology boosting frame rates, achieving this level of performance, particularly in games like Marvel Rivals, would require an RTX 5090 and possibly frame generation. However, using frame generation in competitive games can introduce latency, which is a significant drawback.

To fully leverage these high refresh rates, a powerful CPU is essential. At frame rates around 600 fps, the CPU must supply the GPU with data quickly enough to maintain performance. Technologies like Nvidia Reflex and frame generation can help, but a robust CPU is still crucial.

The advantage of such high frame rates lies in the potential for incredibly low render latency, which is critical in competitive gaming. For instance, competitive players of Counter-Strike 2 often use the lowest settings to maximize frame rates and minimize input lag, as even a slight advantage can be decisive. Whether the likely high cost of these monitors justifies the performance gains remains a question for many gamers.